__/ [Malware Magnet] on Sunday 25 December 2005 15:41 \__
> On 2005-12-25, Bock <electronicmailfixtosend@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Well, the best way to describe the difference between windows and linux
>> is that windows is an automatic car and linux is a standard car.
True. Ten years ago.
>> I bought a new computer to install linux as my old computer is just way
>> too small, falling apart and getting to be unstable.
>> I had to buy windows xp loaded. I turned it on and there was only
>> notepad and wordpad. Neither of these accessed spell check. How mean
>> can microsoft be after all the money it has made and given away not to
>> allow people spell check in wordpad?
>> Word never worked with with win98 so i used notepad and simply copied
>> stuff into an email, did a spell check, and copied the corrected version
>> back. This was a daily reminder why I wanted to say good-bye to
>> microsoft given the chance.
Excellent example which I often make use of.
>> In North America it is impossible to program with Europeans characters
>> under windows. How narrow minded is that?
>> Windows standardized computers in the beginning thereby encouraging the
>> average person to buy and successfully operate a computer.
>> But there comes a point when companies grow so large they for purposes
>> of survival and power act against the best interests of the market.
>> Linux has and will continue to have it growing pains just like windows
>> did but there is room enough for both.
>> As the world gets closering to some form of war or expsanded war,
>> government reliance on microsoft raises questions in many countries
>> because it is closed source code.
>> Most of us have been waiting 5 years to leave windows/microsoft.
Who is "us"? You mean "I". Many colleagues of mine want to move to Linux, but
they are frightened because of stereotypes, often attributed to redundant
cyberspace trollery and self-defence-type justifications (attack of the
unknown, bashing of potential change).
>> Nobody is talking about windows or microsoft that I know of. They talk
>> about emails and spam else they talk about linux or they don't ever
>> mention computers because their use is mundane and automatic.
> I agree.
> And, with regard to several of the points you make, it is important to
> remember that MS is a business and Linux/OSS is a community (with a few
> exceptions). A community is not subject to the same restrictions and
> constraints than is a business. With a global base of talented, determined
> contributors, Linux can weather any storm and outlast other factions of
> the industry because the goal is progress, not profit.
Regarding the OP's last point: Linux users talk about computers because
people who work with computers and understand them at a low level of
granularity *choose* Linux. To many Windows users, the scope of any computer
is E-mail and Internet Explorer (for Hotmail). Have you recently taken a
look at what Linux users actually try to achieve with their workstation/s or
server/s? They succeed tremendously too. I urge you to explore.
Roy S. Schestowitz | WARNING: /dev/null running out of space
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
6:00pm up 15 days 1:11, 12 users, load average: 1.18, 1.06, 1.01
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms