Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: duplicate pages

  • Subject: Re: duplicate pages
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:01:32 +0100
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Manchester University
  • References: <DAmDe.182821$75.7948880@news4.tin.it> <c44sd15e1mgu6ens7e8nqkbhpvg6qh08u5@4ax.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
Big Bill wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 06:56:35 GMT, "Bobby" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
> 
>>Hi,
>>I have a site of 120 pages. 10 of this are VERY similar becouse they are a
>>description of similar products. Do you think that it could be dangerouse
>>? Would I get penalized ?
>>What do you recommend ? To us <meta name="robots"
>>content="noindex,nofollow"> ?
> 
> No beause they'll ignore it anyway and what's the point in having
> content if it can't be recognised by the engines?
> 
>>Please let me know
> 
> Re-write the pages. Get creative.

Will the different yet similar pages be helpful to the _users_? Splitting an
existing product into separate chunks ('fragmenting') is often worse from a
user's point-of-view as it's deceiving.

I don't think you will get penalised if the pages vary in content (word
count) and the phrases vary (flow dissimilarity). Like Bill said, be
creative and you will not need to exclude pages from the crawling cycle.
You will also lodge in more SERP's although PR 'energy' will be spread
among more pages, which will result in ranks declining.

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz
http://Schestowitz.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index