Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: rel="nofollow"

  • Subject: Re: rel="nofollow"
  • From: "Mikkel Mldrup-Lakjer" <mikkel@fabel.dk>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:58:03 +0200
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
  • References: <429deabe$0$18649$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <b_lne.24591$Fv.16034@lakeread01> <d7kqqi$2oim$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk>
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk alt.internet.search-engines:60798
"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> skrev i en meddelelse 
d7kqqi$2oim$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk">news:d7kqqi$2oim$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk...
>
> I think that unrealted links should result in no PR gain to the 
> receiver; no
> penalty to the linking side...

Hm... yes thats a good point; however, I don't know how that could be 
operationalised.

> If your site is large enough, I think you might be throwing away 
> valuable
> time. You will be better off extending your content or adding 
> sub-pages.

That's probably true. However, I had some outbound links to do with my 
site's statistics and html validation on every page, which I could 
easily neutralise in my ssi-file.

> Never should. Bear in mind that when using rel="nofollow", you prevent 
> the
> linked site from knowing about your existence and perhaps giving you
> something in return.

That's true.

Mikkel 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index