SEO Dave wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 05:25:54 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>Dave, with your ~100,000 page, random content sites
> Show me my "~100,000 page, random content sites" please?
> I don't have any random content pages, all my pages are quite
>>I am not surprised that
>>you defend the proposition that unrelated links are fine.
> Where did I say unrelated links are fine? I've said the opposite many,
> many times you should avoid linking to pages not related to that pages
> content. Note AVOID not stop completely, you can not easily run a
> successful network of sites without some linking to unrelated pages.
> I was taking a pot shot at John for stalking Stacey again, basically
> twisting his words like he keeps doing (have you read the validation
> type threads?). Difference is I'm man enough to admit I'm doing it.
>>Unsocial behaviour like random content and unrelated links would shatter
>>you in the real world.
> Unsocial behaviour, LOL
>>I first joined this newsgroup in order to better
>>understand SE's, but not to fool them or fiddle with them.
> Good for you, how's that working for you?
Quite good, actually. Around 1,000 visitors a day for content that I wrote
myself. The domain is only 9 months old and I do not exchange links or do
Roy S. Schestowitz