Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: rel="nofollow"

  • Subject: Re: rel="nofollow"
  • From: "Stacey" <stacey@staceyssimplestuff.com>
  • Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:37:07 -0400
  • Newsgroups: alt.internet.search-engines
  • Organization: Stacey's Simple Stuff
  • References: <429deabe$0$18649$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <b_lne.24591$Fv.16034@lakeread01> <d7kqqi$2oim$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk>
  • Reply-to: "Stacey" <http://www.staceyssimplestuff.com>
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk alt.internet.search-engines:60777
"Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@schestowitz.com> wrote in message 
d7kqqi$2oim$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk">news:d7kqqi$2oim$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk...
> Stacey wrote:
>
>> "Mikkel Møldrup-Lakjer" <mikkel@fabel.dk> wrote in message
>> news:429deabe$0$18649$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
>>
>>>I just recently learned about how outbound links can affect the total PR
>>> of a site.
>>
>> Yeah, not that much though. It all depends how much you have going out.
>
> I never knew linking was a 'crime'. Pages without links are poorer to the
> reader because they are a narrow. Imagine yourself a paper without
> citations.
>

Never said it was a crime. Say you have a paper with 100 non related links 
going out. Not good for your paper for someone wanting to read it or someone 
wanting to publish it.

So, it depends on how much you have going out!

Stacey 



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index