Thor wrote:
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> Thor wrote:
>>
>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Decent = non-existent. I don't even think Outlook has widget named
>>>> 'reply-to-list'. A list is a list. If works properly, its 'reply-to'
>>>> address must always be the mailing list's, not the sender's.
>>>
>>> Bollocks, why would you be even considering Outlook as the end all and b
>>> all of mailing programs, this is a linux group in case you had
>>> forgotten. Kmail certainly has a reply to mailing list and a reply to
>>> all option.
>>
>> Outlook is unfortunately what most people consider the 'mother of all'.
>> Narrow-mindedness is what this is.
>>
>> The KMail version I have (1.5.1) is a buggy piece of software and the
>> only reason I haven't installed Thunderbird to replace it is that I'm too
>> reluctant to reconfigure PGP, import mail, set up filters, etc.
>>
>> Roy
>>
>
> Have you tried sylpheed, that has a reply-to-mailing-list option. I
> thought it did but just to be sure I dled and ran it :). I prefer it to
> thunderbird, though obviously from my previous post I use kmail pretty
> much exclusively.
Don't get me wrong. I like KMail, but I'm on SuSE 8.1 with KDE 3.1 so I use
an old version of KMail. The reason I am inclined to use Thunderbird is
inter-operability. I am familiar with many mail clients already and I don't
consider this to be a /valuable/ or /necessary/ skill. My head is already
messed up because of the mish-mash of keyboard shortcuts.
Roy
--
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.com
|
|
