__/ [Big Bill] on Tuesday 01 November 2005 12:50 \__
>>> Yes, we should expect certain qty of such people there beacuse of
>>> nature of newsgroups - someone going to find a decision of a problem
>>> here, someone going to help.
>>It is still favourite group to be in and the discussion used to be very
>>stimulating. Then came a wave of quirks and I thought to myself "is it only
>>me?...". Finally I decided to ask and see if others sensed the same thing.
>>The quality can degrade if occupancy in the group changes.
> Our only alternative is the forums. They seem to be peopled by folk
> who spend so much time posting I doubt any of them do any actual work.
Posting and discussing is about interactive learning, which is in some
sense working. Working solely without communication or peer feedback is
bound to failure. Many things I have learned from you guys have helped me
a lot. If this community 'weakens', we might all suffer as a consequence,
but that's just my personal stance.
Roy S. Schestowitz | "ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI"
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
1:35pm up 67 days 19:24, 5 users, load average: 0.11, 0.09, 0.35
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms