__/ [ Paul B ] on Monday 03 April 2006 19:21 \__
> On Sun, 02 Apr 2006 18:56:15 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>__/ [ Badass Scotsman ] on Sunday 02 April 2006 14:11 \__
>>> "Paul B" <lamewolf2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> Anyone else notice their PR playing around ?
>>>> Site was a PR5, and today PR4 umph !
> Still showing PR4 today too :(
> Nothing on webmasterworld, and I see other sites that have reverted to
> their old PR values. Can't get results from McDar either. :/
I think that what you need is Mc*Bar*, not McDar. Grab a beer and forget
about this figure, which is only visible on that one particular page to a
small minority of surfers who actually mind the gauges. My site had a higher
PageRank 12 months ago when the number of inbound link was roughly 10 times
less. That comes to prove something.
PS - In case I didn't make it obvious before, my 'plea' for Google was
overrated. The whole thing in general was not distressing, but I thought it
was worth taking a couple of minutes and write if it could improve traffic.
Update: I am running Visitors at the moment because it seems like traffic
/may/ be returning to normal (~600+~400 images).
Roy S. Schestowitz | while (!0==1) each 'Bill Gates' > /dev/null
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
8:15pm up 26 days 9:58, 9 users, load average: 0.53, 0.68, 0.54
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine