It was on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:05:25 +0100 when Roy Schestowitz posted
> __/ [ DFS ] on Tuesday 25 April 2006 15:59 \__
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> __/ [ William Poaster ] on Tuesday 25 April 2006 13:12 \__
>>>> It was on Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:38:35 +0100 when BearItAll posted this:
>>>>> DFS wrote:
>>>> Funny isn't it. DooFu$ claims 95% of computers in the world run
>>>> Windows, yet denies that 80% of spam comes from hijacked windoze
>>> This was published in a recent article. To get the link, I will need to
>> I'm sure it comes from an unbiased source like those.
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | UK security firm Sophos estimates that 40 percent of spam is now sent by
> | zombie machines. Sandvine, a network security firm, puts the figure at
> | 80 percent.
> I originally came across in a different unbiased source. So I guess these
> Windows zombies, which you argue do not exist or do no harm, deliver
> between 50 to 100 spam messages to me, per day. Thank you, Windows O/S.
So, is he saying that the BBC, USAtoday, PCWorld, etc are biased? He's
more stupid than I first thought. He probably believes, that if it doesn't
come from Redmond, it's heresy!
>>> The person who needs convincing, however, is not worth it. His 'style'
>>> involves insults
>> That's rich, coming from one of the biggest liars and insulters on cola.
>> Can you even WRITE a sentence that doesn't insult MS or Windows?
>>> and I hear that he is a racist too.
>> Yes. And?
> Get your act together and be polite if you want to have a constructive
> argument rather than a confrontation.
DFS, a *constructive* argument? You're pushing it there, Roy!
WARNING! Do not drive your
vehicle after using Windows.
Frustration may be taken out
on other road users.