Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: To robots.txt or not

  • Subject: Re: To robots.txt or not
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:08:16 +0100
  • Newsgroups: alt.www.webmaster
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <o7SdnSK9wJBARczZnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d@pipex.net> <1146227547.712073.99260@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ dingbat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] on Friday 28 April 2006 13:32 \__

> Brian Cryer wrote:
> 
>> is generally considered better etiquette to not have a robots.txt file or
>> to have an empty one?
> 
> Have one - keeps the 404s down for simpler logs   (same with
> favicon.ico)
 
Precisely. This should make no difference according to what I once read.
There is also a file called siteinfo.xml (if I recall the name correctly),
which is Alexa-specific. I can also think of requests that assume a Windows
servers and raise 404's. All these additional files tend to contribute to
clutter, so they are better redirected away or served as empty files.

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      |    Useless fact: Sharks are immune to cancer
http://Schestowitz.com  |    SuSE Linux     ¦     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
  2:05pm  up  21:10,  13 users,  load average: 0.34, 0.41, 0.44
      http://iuron.com - Open Source knowledge engine project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index