Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Torvalds lambasts Free Software Foundation

  • Subject: Re: Torvalds lambasts Free Software Foundation
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:46:25 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / ISBE, Manchester University / ITS
  • References: <1154359043.205736.5420@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com> <pan.2006.07.31.16.24.35.530278@yahoo.com> <ealp0p$m8i$1@tux.glaci.com> <i2p2q3-ed.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <1154400682.359886.256150@s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <83c3q3-3o8.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Tuesday 01 August 2006 08:22 \__

> begin  oe_protect.scr
> George Ellison (undercover) <notamisfit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> 
>> 
>> Mark Kent wrote:
>> 
>><snip>
>> 
>>>Agressive, abusive language does not usually help in debate;  typically,
>>> it indicates that the speaker/writer is at a loss as to how to express
>>> themselves clearly.  It's not a good choice when trying to state a
>>> position on something.  Linus T ought to know better, I think...
>>>
>> 
>> He was fairly eloquent throughout most of the debate except for the
>> first post. He's like Theo de Raadt in that respect: if he's got
>> something to say, he _says_ it, and fragile egos are more than free to
>> take cover.
> 
> We can all state things abusively - that's easy.

It's easier to kfile. Right, Mark? *smile*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index