John Bokma wrote:
> Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On 8 Aug 2006 00:24:19 GMT, John Bokma <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>Paul <lamewolf2004[REMOVE]@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:16:21 +0100, Roy Schestowitz
> >>> <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>Gives a whole new perspective to the sheer amount of content out
> >>> You mean duplicated and hotlinked content out there ;)
> >>Which is good, since then it will collapse soon :-D.
> > We can only hope :)
> It will happen :-) But yeah, I agree, the sooner the better. I get tired
> of the blogs that blog on things read on another blog, since the "another
> blog" has used the same approach.
Took me a minute to catch on with what you meant earlier today about
doing some writing. I finally saw what you mean. Looks pretty good. I
see nice use of linguistic elements. Nice traffic statistics. Let's see
what happens with it. If it doesn't jump up and down I have an idea
that you may want to try. It's just a little wee puny itsy-bitsy
teeny-weeny microscopic insignificantly small thing.
Search Engines Strategy http://www.rezultz-web-site-promotion.com/ Make
it jump up and down to shake it out of the leghold.