__/ [ The Ghost In The Machine ] on Wednesday 06 December 2006 15:40 \__
> In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Sinister Midget
> <phydeaux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote
> on Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:58:42 GMT
> <qd2j44-7n1.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 2006-12-06, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted
>> something concerning:
>>> Unbreakable Linux still unproven, analyst warns
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| IT managers running Red Hat Linux should think carefully before
>>>| making the switch to Unbreakable Linux, the new Linux distribution
>>>| that Oracle Corp. announced last month.
>>> `----
>>>
>>>
http://searchopensource.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid39_gci1233083,00.html
>>> http://tinyurl.com/twor8
>>>
>>> Less reason for Red Hat to worry.
>>
>> It was a stupid name anyway.
>>
>> However, linux can't be proven to be unbreakable, while Windows is
>> known to be broken in dozens of ways. So everybody should do the right
>> thing by using the proven product, Windows.
>>
>
> Of course. What's good for Microsoft is good for the country.
Which one?
> (Now where have I heard that before....? :-) )
Too bad all that stash is in Ireland and Microsoft pays no divident, eh? Too
bad the wealth goes to {a chosen few}^tm, all at the expense of a diverse
industry that employs more people.
Too bad...
Microsoft.
Too bad.
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | GPL'd 3-D Reversi: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | RHAT GNU/Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
run-level 5 Oct 18 14:45 last=S
http://iuron.com - help build a non-profit search engine
|
|
