On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 14:44:29 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ William Poaster ] on Monday 04 December 2006 13:21 \__
>> On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 12:31:38 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> Is the Vista 'Final' really RC3 in disguise?
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | But with the true consumer and business launch slated for January
>>> | 30, the current release feels like an excellent RC3 than the true
>>> | finished product.
>>> There you go. That's like the third time that a respectable site ponders
>>> if Vista is just a service pack. We had this argument before.
>> "The King's New Clothes" ;-)
> Someone who is Danish (the source of the famous tale) got a littleupset when
> I said that because it's an "emperor", not a king.
Ah, so it is. My bad!
> The point of the post, among more obvious things such as a reality check
> (hopping beyond the MS-funded and MS-generated hype), was to rebut some
> accusations by Wong and co. (other apologists and critics). Many people have
> called Vista a service pack with eye candy (or something along these lines).
> There's also this one from March.
> I wasn't aware of similar opinions at the time.
> Best wishes,
When I hear of a long time smoker dying of lung cancer
I think "That's too bad, but they made their choices".
When I hear about companies getting screwed by Microsoft,
I think the same thing.