Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Linux Advocacy -- choosing the best

  • Subject: Re: Linux Advocacy -- choosing the best
  • From: Hadron Quark <qadronhuark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 15:36:21 +0100
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:JPWLYF2CXVRSeGhxfYuwgvBUuuc=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <u6mdnX-8-YwJixvYnZ2dnUVZ_t-mnZ2d@comcast.com> <reply_in_group-95219E.21500817122006@news.supernews.com> <Rwxhh.8$lC5.2@newsfe12.lga>
  • User-agent: Gnus
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:470480
flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 21:50:08 -0800, Tim Smith wrote:
>
>> In article <u6mdnX-8-YwJixvYnZ2dnUVZ_t-mnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>  mlw <mlw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> First:
>>> I use Linux, I have for over a decade.
>>> I have contributed patches to the Linux kernel.
>>> I have a number of GPL licensed projects available to the general public.
>>> I periodically contribute to open source projects including PHP, PostgreSQL,
>>> and others.
>> 
>> But according to Mark Kent, you are a wintroll! :-)
>
> Mark Kent is an idiot.
> Mark Kent, Roy Shestowich, Roy Culley and William Poaster can't handle
> honest debate which might reveal some weak points of Linux or especially
> the Linux philosophy.
>
> With them it's all Linux or nothing.
>
> mlw, Oliver Wong, Black Dragon amongst others tell it like it is and the
> COLA gang (mentioned above), can't deal with it so they try to discredit
> these posters.
>  

When I think of the COLA Gang, it would not be complete without Chrisv
as the court Jester and Peter KÃhlmann who is in charge of the church
inquisitions. An honourable mention should go to Rex as the wise, but
mad, elder statesman.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index