On Friday 29 December 2006 22:16 Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Windows Vista Rant
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Now, is there any point to this rant? Well sort of. You see there
> | is already an operating system which does ALL the things Vista
> | claims and has been on the user market for long enough that it's
> | reliability and security are proven.
> |
> | Linux.
> |
> | Now, I hate Ubuntu but you can get it for free, it will do
> | everything PCW claims are selling points for Vista and will run
> | fast and secure on things other than the top of the range PCs.
> | If you get Vista / Office 2007 you will need to learn new user
> | interfaces and ways of doing things, so why not save yourself
> | a few hundred pounds and get Linux?
> `----
>
> http://www.whydontyou.org.uk/blog/2006/12/29/windows-vista/
>
>
> Microsoft Looks Beyond Vista Bugs
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Reavey stated that even though the vulnerability impacts Windows
> | Vista, he still believes that Vista is the company's most secure
> | platform to date. The MSRC encourages all users to enable a
> | firewall, and apply all security updates.
> `----
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/nf/20061229/tc_nf/49017
>
> Sounds like XP all over again, only with more buggy (rough edges).
Ah yes, but cop for this bit:-
"ITâS FASTER, MORE RELIABLE AND MORE SECURE"
Follow that through.....
- so XP was/is slow?
- so XP was/is unreliable?
- so XP was/is less secure?
but what did they say about XP.....?
|
|
