Roy Schestowitz arranged shapes to form:
> __/ [Davémon] on Monday 13 February 2006 17:37 \__
>> is rubbish.
>> anyone wanna to help sort it out?
> It looks reasonable to me. Slightly incomplete, but well-structured
really? Saul Bass illustrating 'early design' makes sence? Theory before
history? Dominance of a single 'theory'? Dominance in history of western
Graphic design (why is russian constructivism religated to the bottom).
> I am personally not fond of such Wikis where you have to fight
> in order to keep your text in tact.
what, like when people hijack your thread by changing the title ;-)
> Some Wipepedians retain mirrors with
> their perspective and/or contribution, so I suppose I could dive in...
> What do you find inaccurate?
The tone and structure.