This message was posted on Usenet, NOT JLAforums, & on Mon, 03 Jul 2006
12:32:03 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
<snip>
> Have you ever seen a post of Erik F, DFS, tab, billwg or flatfish which
> did not contain at least one outright lie? Apart from "well, duh..." posts
> naturally
DFS & billwg outright lie virtually all the time. flatfish posts almost
the same thing, time after time. tab shouts (posting in caps) & froths, &
IMO is verging on k00kery. In fact if you believed what he posts, he
really shouldn't be allowed out without a nanny.
> Erik especially claims a lot of things he clearly pulled out of his ass.
> And somehow he never comes around to provide a shed of evidence for it,
> but instead runs from demands to do so.
> He should start to answer the most pressing questions before even
> attempting to demand such like from no matter whom.
I assume you're referring to this growing list of unanswered questions:
1] Where does NTFS store its journal?
2] How did the Morris worm spread by email?
3] What about using MS TT fonts on Linux?
4]Can he provide evidence for plenty of examples of competing ISO
standards?
5] Why is ok for *him* (without asking permission) to publicize other
people's personal information, but if a person chooses to
publicize personal information about *himself*, it is "inappropriate".
6] What about the "thousands of root exploits per month" he claimed,
& was then found to be making it all up?
7] How does Funkenbusch *know* Roy didn't come by the picture he's
ranting about, honestly?
8] How does he *know* that Roy does /not/ have the legitimate right to
use the picture despite what the copyright owner claims is the case?
But I daresay "Ewik The Weasel" will probably continue to ignore it.
--
I used to like a good joke.
What happened?
I thought there was a better way, so I
stopped using Windows & switched to linux.
|
|
