Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Microsoft's ODF/XML Translater is Open, Not Free

__/ [ B Gruff ] on Saturday 08 July 2006 16:22 \__

> On Saturday 08 July 2006 08:09 Jim Richardson wrote:
> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 13:29:49 +0100,
>>  Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Microsoft shows its ankle for open source
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| Microsoft's J Cannon wants you to know that the ODF Add-in for Word 2007
>>>| is not simply free. It's open... as in free source code. To further
>>>| embed that message, the author drones: The Open XML Translator is an
>>>| Open Source project.
>>> `----
>>>
>>>         http://www.trimmail.com/news/elsewhere/data/1152214772.86/
>> 
>> 
>> I am sure we will now see Erik et al step in and state that MS should
>> stop wasting time, diluting effort, and instead join one of the existing
>> OSS projects for this.
>> 
>> Right Erik?
> 
> I stand to be corrected on this (please feel free), but my understanding is
> that the situation is actually worse than you state.
> My understanding is that the "MS Plugin" is an Import and Export facility.
> My understanding of the "true FOSS" projects is that they are working on
> plug-ins which will allow one to open, work on, and save in ODF from MS
> Office, just as though it were .TXT or .DOC etc.
> 
> As I say, I might be wrong, but if I'm right, the latter is a superb way to
> do it, and the former (MS) way is what we call a real ball-ache!

Interesting. It get more curiosity-inspiring by the day. Could Microsoft's
proposed 'translator' be merely a way to push away the otherwise forced
inclusion of third-party plug-ins?

Earlier today I read that there were /several/ other projects that achieve
the same thing as Microsoft did. Microsoft, however, snubbed these
completely and started its own open source project with a restrictive
licence (BSD-affiliated?).

I am beginning to suspect that Microsoft wanted to have rivals and clients
off its back. It got what it had wanted while the plug-in remains in its
complete control, i.e. it can be crippled, restricted, sabotaged, or even
sold (albeit I very much doubt the last).

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      |    X-No-Archive: No. Stand behind what you say
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer ¦  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s):  19.9% user,   3.4% system,  15.2% nice,  61.5% idle
      http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index