Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: VIA Chipsets Not Windows Compatible?

  • Subject: Re: VIA Chipsets Not Windows Compatible?
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 08:27:25 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / MCC / Manchester University
  • References: <1149628168.177893.245140@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <4486349E.A1CFC2A7@seanet.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Paul Hovnanian P.E. ] on Wednesday 07 June 2006 03:06 \__

> "nessuno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" wrote:
>> 
>> Quote:
>> ----------------------
>> Adding onto the laundry-list of issues that several UMPCs are
>> experiencing, it appears that the VIA chipsets used in several UMPCs
>> (such as the TabletKiosk eo and the Paceblade E7) might have some
>> Windows compatibility issues, according to a report on the Carrypad
>> UMPC Journal. Specifically, several hardware features on the chipsets
>> don't work correctly in Windows, while working well in certain Linux
>> distributions. This flaw was found during the Carrypad's review of the
>> Paceblade E7 UMPC while doing video playback tests and if this report
>> turns out to be true it could damage VIA's reputation among computer
>> makers and consumers alike.
>> ------------------
>> End quote
> 
> Why would it harm their reputation? The chipsets work. Its just that
> _SOMEBODY_ can't write workable drivers for them.


Exactly. That's the way things _SHOULD_ be done. Work from the specifications
and interfaces towards an implementation on a platform rather than doing it
the other way around. That is the key to interoperability. More vendors
should learn from VIA.


>> http://www.dlmag.com/1785/via-chipsets-not-windows-compatible.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index