Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Why Linux and Windows NT series are not fairly compared

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

__/ [ roy.schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx ] on Monday 19 June 2006 19:06 \__

> samir.ribic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> The comparision between Linux and Windows (I mean NT/2000/XP series)
>> often rises to flame war. Linux users often point to bad and buggy
>> Internet Explorer, and tell that it is the main reason why Windows is
>> crap. When someone points that Konqueror and Firefox under Linux can
>> crash very often, the counter argument is "They are not integral part
>> of Linux, you are not forced to use them". When someone points that
>> Linux is slower, the answer is "Do not use KDE, and Linux will be fast"
> 
> Firefox under Linux crashes all the time. The last time I used Internet


I DID NOT SAY THIS. roy.schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx is an imposter. Please killfile
that address.


> Explorer was about 4 months ago and it never crashed on SP2...
> Not to mention the fact that firefox it could not handle CSS properly.
> The
> administration panel of a CMS rely on was not usable. Literally. It is
> heavily non standards-based, but I could not do anything because
> widgets were
> not rendered.
> 
> 
>> But, if Linux is just a kernel, should be more fair to compare Linux
>> kernel with NTOSKRNL.EXE file? They are both fast, very stable and
>> useless without user level programs.
> 
> In Linux, the /user/ can *CHOOSE* what goes on top of the kernel.
> Of course much of what goes on top of the kernel is buggy but that does
> not mean Linux itself is buggy because Linux is the kernel.
> Why would one want, let us say, a lightwight Windows Vista?  Apache
> server on
> Windows is great because it actually serves pages without having to use
> command-line mode?


I did not say this. Please killfile roy.schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx because you may
otherwise get more of that crossposted drivel.

Best wishes,

(The real) Roy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEl02wU4xAY3RXLo4RAjwnAJ0fOfSHdxhVXR01xkTwBVCg+OjZiQCdHAH7
gXgr4vF5X3SLnJHwByAX8eg=
=8gex
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index