-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:47:44 -0500,
Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:37:16 GMT, spike1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>> No, the fact that he's willfully infringing the copyright and making money
>>> off of it does. That is the legal definition of criminal infringement.
>>
>> copyright infringement isn't a criminal offence unless the value of the
>> material infringed is more than a certain amount of money.
>>
>> I dount one image accounts for 10p, let alone whatever that amount is.
>
> In the US, that's not true. If you make *ANY* money in the process of
> infringing, and that infringement is willful, then it's criminal. The
> amount of money involved is irrelevant. It's also criminal if the work is
> worth more than $10,000.
free clue,
Roy's not *in* the US... you *did* know that, right Erik?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEj8sAd90bcYOAWPYRAgOiAKDlD1hV07kA0I0RlsOlmyOi6UQQcQCeN4nN
XpQYr/nYoRTL+uxdaiyoYAg=
=GOH4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Jim Richardson http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
"The only cure for boredom is curiosity. There is no cure for curiosity."
-Dorothy Parker
|
|
