Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Pirate?! WTF?!

  • Subject: Re: Pirate?! WTF?!
  • From: Jim Richardson <warlock@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:36:17 -0700
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Erisian claw
  • References: <pan.2006.06.08.12.55.17.959705@kubuntu605.eu> <1265143.e5ArBauog6@127.0.0.1> <pan.2006.06.09.14.50.12.17567@kubuntu605.eu> <1170139.UG53X4Jstv@127.0.0.1> <pan.2006.06.10.07.23.06.196314@suse100oss.eu> <vhlql3-10a.ln1@dog.did.it> <1149940666.175903.28340@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <aam1m3-1df.ln1@clark.harry.net> <1b16puxxkggdc$.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <slrne8tps8.rg3.edwards@trurl.bsd.uchicago.edu> <5s93m3-j5b.ln1@clark.harry.net> <7f1usq6mfeqk.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <u23u82t04rm3alqdm70oatbkce4upp8jsc@4ax.com> <ocn3m3-tm7.ln1@ellandroad.demon.co.uk> <1sdtvsnmrnhzr$.dlg@funkenbusch.com>
  • User-agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Debian)
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1119182
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:51:41 -0500,
 Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 22:30:32 +0100, Mark Kent wrote:
>
>> begin  oe_protect.scr 
>> chrisv <chrisv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>>> Erik "the weasel" Funkenbusch wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Of course when Daeron tried to get Simon fired for posting to COLA, that
>>>>was ok with most of the COLA people.  And then when Daeron tried to destroy
>>>>Simon's employer for not firing him, by sending their customes emails that
>>>>was OK with most of the COLA regulars too.
>>> 
>>> You're a bald-faced liar, Erik.  "Most COLA people" do NOT condone
>>> taking things to real life, you pathetic troll.
>>> 
>> 
>> There's nothing quite like a completely unsupported generalisation, is
>> there?  Erik cares not one jot for the truth, methinks.
>
> Oh, I see.  When the artist of the work doesn't come forward to coomplain
> about the infringement, then that must mean he's ok with it.
>
> Yet when COLA people don't decry horrid behavior, that's not being ok with
> it.  
>

And again, you switch positions, when people asked you why you didn't
respond to blatantly wrong and false statements from windows "advocates"
you stated that not responding, wasn't the same thing as supporting,
now, you are accusing all who don't jump on Roy, of supporting him.


Make up your fucking mind. 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEj8qBd90bcYOAWPYRAu5vAKCCaKgBGSgU8ib88RB6JbTiNPleZgCdF9/B
K9Dfu9DER+94NUjyHED1qXA=
=JGuF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
Jim Richardson     http://www.eskimo.com/~warlock
  Words fail me.  Thank goodness I can make gestures.
                                   --  Mark Hughes (in asr - 2001

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index