Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: The Difference Between "Linux" and "GNU/Linux"

__/ [ Mark Kent ] on Friday 30 June 2006 14:48 \__

> begin  oe_protect.scr
> Da'Punk-A <dapunka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
>> 
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>>> Perhaps the use of the word "Linux" alone is the best way to go, at the
>>> expense of 'political correctness'. Maybe even something catchy like an
>>> existing name would do, e.g. Macintosh (*cough* DRM, Intel, closed-source
>>> kernel).
>> 
>> Not only is "Linux" by itself perhaps the best way to go, it is the way
>> that most of the world /has/ gone.  Linux is, strictly speaking, just
>> the kernel, I think we all know that here.  But in the wider world,
>> whenever people talk about Linux, they call it Linux. What's this NG
>> called?  COLA, not COG/LA.  People who are thinking of migrating from
>> Microsoft or Apple, when looking for info on the web, type "Linux" into
>> Google.  Talking about "GNU/Linux" will elicit blank stares from these
>> people.  And if you explain the issue to them, they're likely to think:
>>  "So what?  Who cares?"
>> 
>> Stallman has lost this particular battle.  And it's no big deal.  How
>> many people do you think really care?
>> 
> 
> I suspect that the people who did all the work to make it even possible
> probably care;  personally, I think it's right that people should get
> the credit for what they have done.


Exactly. But lest we forget that it's mutual. Without a kernel that's better
than others (e.g. Hurd) and without rigour from kernel hackers, who knows if
GNU would have received as much recognition. I'm in favour of giving full
credit though. I just feel like I confuse people when mentioning GNU and the
association with RMS is unnerving to some.


> I wouldn't see it as a battle, to be honest, more as correcting mistakes
> due to people being ill-informed - like those yanks who say "I could
> care less" when they mean "I couldn't care less" - it's an education
> problem - people don't learn if you don't take the time to explain
> things to them.


How about conceptual simplifications (omissions) that never help? Things like
"I can't go on the Internet" (often meaning "I can't reach Web pages").

Best wishes,

Roy

-- 
Roy S. Schestowitz      |    England - 1  Ecuador - 0
http://Schestowitz.com  | Free as in Free Beer ¦  PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s):  20.2% user,   3.6% system,  17.0% nice,  59.2% idle
      http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index