On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 15:28:28 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Black Dragon ] on Sunday 05 March 2006 13:54 \__
>> William Poaster wrote:
>>> Yes, a few other archives ignore the "X-No-Archive" header, that's why
>>> it's a waste of time!
>> Since you're claiming XNA is "a waste of time", why then do you and
>> several other cola regulars always make such a big fuss about it?
>> Does anybody besides me miss the old DejaNews? I think what Google has
>> done with the Usenet archives is utterly deplorable. :-(
> It's not just the archives, BD. A more worrisome fact is that they slowly
> convert UseNet into 'Google Chat'. That is most definitely the bigger
> issue. Do not expect quotes and attributions when Google takes over the
> world, communication included.
It's also a waste of time, because anyone replying to them still records
their post. IMO we aren't the ones bothered about XNA, but they are or why
else would they use it?
SuSE 10.1 OSS Beta3 (Agama Lizard)