__/ [ Larry Qualig ] on Monday 13 March 2006 15:23 \__
> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [ Jim Richardson ] on Sunday 12 March 2006 19:30 \__
>> > On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 18:01:44 +0100,
>> > Roy Culley <rgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Seems you have got your knickers in a twist Larry boy. Only to be
>> >> expected I suppose but from what I've seen in followups you come
>> >> across as exceedingly immature and naive even to the extent of
>> >> thinking that some forged posts were from me.
>> >> Suffice to say Larry, that when I said you were an arsehole you were
>> >> also plonked. You have shown yourself to be a wintroll and arsehole on
>> >> numerous occasions. Your reply to Peter was just one too many.
>> > he got suckered in by a forger, not a very good forge, but perhaps
>> > sufficient unto the task.
>> That aside, Larry has been changing his tune recently. For a while, I
>> could have balanced conversations with him, but that bias of contempt and
>> prejudice towards Linux. However, I continue to suspect that the forger,
>> as well as Peter, have got his sentiments vexed up.
> I have no problem with Linux Roy. I use it when I want to and because I
> want to. What I do have a problem with are the lies and dishonesty that
> passes for "advocacy" by its supporters.
I don't consider what I post to be lies, but see my other reply to your
Roy S. Schestowitz | Linux: most popular O/S, yet not most widespread
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
4:25pm up 5 days 9:02, 7 users, load average: 0.65, 0.58, 0.60
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms