__/ [ Sinister Midget ] on Wednesday 22 March 2006 11:36 \__
> On 2006-03-22, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> posted
> something concerning:
>>
http://www.businessweek.com/mediacenter/podcasts/techmaven/techandu_03_09_06.htm
>>
>> No, it's not intended to open competition and facilitate uninstallation of
>> IE. It is security-driven.
>
> This has to be a lie. They swore in court, under oath, that it's all
> inseparable.
Care to cite or quote?
Regardless, any programmatic task is reversible. In physical terms, a
demolishion (=Singularity) is often mandatory. Not only that, but backward
compatibility should not be compromised either.
Best wishes,
Roy
--
Roy S. Schestowitz | Previous signature has been conceded
http://Schestowitz.com | SuSE Linux ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
11:40am up 14 days 4:17, 8 users, load average: 2.07, 1.16, 0.91
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|