__/ [ Stacey ] on Friday 12 May 2006 23:01 \__
> "Paul B" <lamewolf2004@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> On 12 May 2006 14:16:01 -0700, bucher28@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Amber, if you are too lazy to separate message body from subject line, why
bother? People in here invest in offering their free time to help. Why can't
you phrase your request more properly?
In Hacker's Slang, this makes you seem like a "lamer"...
No offence intended. Just constructive criticism, I hope.
>>>for got to put my website on here <snip>
>>>Thanks Amber :o)
At the moment, there is a related thread in another newsgroup:
For listings, if you want to enter the dark world of spam and illicit,
blackhat SEO (e.g. guestbook spamming of the innocent), follow Stacey's
advice. If you are a moral person (which I am sure you are), I urge you to
"keep it clean" (the Net ethics/citizenship, not the pr0n).
>> Apart from what Stacey said, you also want to get rid of the redirect,
>> clean up your code, and read up on basic SEO.
> Well, I didn't go look but I always know if you isn't showing up you might
> need some links.:-) So, I went and looked...good thing I don't have
> epilepsy.:-) That redirect to awhile so yeah it needs to go. Plus I then
> noticed she(I suppose Amber is female) didn't have any description and
> keywords. It wouldn't hurt, as Yahoo uses description and the minors use
> the keyword meta. Of course she doesn't need it heavy, sex toys would be
> fine for keywords.
*Ahem*...! *smile* Helpful, constructive advice nonetheless.
Roy S. Schestowitz | Reversi for free: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
4:35pm up 15 days 23:32, 12 users, load average: 1.72, 1.76, 1.27
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine