Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: A simple, rhetorical, question

  • Subject: Re: A simple, rhetorical, question
  • From: rapskat <rapskat@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 02:44:28 -0400
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
  • References: <fppkj3-4tg.ln1@dog.did.it> <pYednVjCIaAhfPrZ4p2dnA@speakeasy.net> <2726615.JP7L5cLBQg@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux))
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1109253
On Mon, 15 May 2006 07:12:07 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> That  being  the case, Windows should not be distributed for use over  the
> Internet.  Firewalls  don't  cut the deal. If a new O/S  gets  built  from
> scratch  to  accommodate  for a multi-use, secure model, that  will  be  a
> different  scenario.  At present, neither XP not Vista are ready  for  the
> Net.  They call it "people-ready" in TV ads, but it is by no means  secure
> or "Net-ready".

Personally, I don't see how Windows has lasted as long as it has.  Any
other product with the track record of Windows would have been pulled from
the market years ago.

To think people actually pay for that crap.  They should pay people to use
it!  Call it Hazard Pay.

-- 
rapskat -  02:39:44 up  2:01,  2 users,  load average: 0.43, 0.68, 0.53


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index