On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:05:43 -0500, flatfish+++ wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:17:40 +0000, Kier wrote:
>
>
>> Where is the proof he was forced to find a new provider? I don't care how
>> often he posts. Particularly as it isn't spam.
>
> A little bird told me that he pissed on someone and the school was made
> aware of his dubious use of their computing systems. Common sense should
> tell you that all of a sudden, out of the blue he moves everything from a
> free setup, which had plenty of bandwidth, to a pay for ISP?
> A somewhat starving college student?
How do you know he's starving? For all you know he might be rich. Or have
you been stalking him?
> No way.
This is not proof. This is you *saying* something, which you haven't
proved. Until you can, stop saying it as if it were true.
>
> And before you start to pin this on me, I've been here for many years and
> have never once narced on anyone with one exception and that was a
> somewhat dangerous stalker type with a serious mental
> disorder.
Sure, sure.
>
>
>> I might even agree that maybe it's time Roy gave his News posts
> a rest,
>> but not while you're shrieking accusations and whining and calling him
>> 'Shysterwitch' when his name is Schestowitz.
>
> He should be happy I don't use his real name all the time.
Why?
> It's less bad press to show up in google when his future employers start
> looking to see what kind of a nutjob they might be hiring.
Balls. Since his real names shows up on every one of his posts, your
stupid assertion that he should somehow be' glad' you are deliberately
screwing up his name in a defamatory manner is utter bollocks.
You reall are a piece of work, flatfish. Your ravings here are scarcely
anything to be proud of, which no doubt is why you hide behind an alias.
You've spent years here shrieking and trolling, hidden behind your fake
name and your X-No-Archive.
Bleh.
--
Kier
|
|
