Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Microsoft won't publicly list patent claims ..

  • Subject: Re: Microsoft won't publicly list patent claims ..
  • From: arachnid <none@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 11:07:34 -0600
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
  • References: <00jgm2p6ehi8juvdbb7prib046phhnm1bd@4ax.com> <4654621.jXL8fxSkkO@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table (Debian GNU/Linux))
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1186286
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 15:38:54 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> As [H]omer said, one line of FUD is worth a thousand lawsuits. The damage
> has been done and even if Ballmer refuses to say anything more, the fear
> among the mis/less informed will linger on. It was only about 5 months ago
> that he spewed out another line of FUD. Something along the lines of "we
> owe it to our shareholders".
> 
> Bear in mind, of course, that the patent threat and the SCO case has led
> to considerable doubt and delays before the migration of Munich to Linux
> began.

You know, two could play this game. Does Microsoft indemnify Windows
applications developers, or cover the cost of a total code rewrite, should
any of that nasty viral GPL find its way into their commercial products
via Microsoft's development tools? There's a lot of source code out there,
you know, and Microsoft programmers are under a lot of time pressure. It
could happen. Really. 



-- 
"Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the
exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them."
- Frederick Douglas


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index