Roy Schestowitz wrote:
[...]
> Bear in mind, of course, that the patent threat and the SCO case has led to
> considerable doubt and delays before the migration of Munich to Linux began.
[NEWS]:
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39260037,00.htm
------
Munich Linux migration delayed by 'PR stunt'
Ingrid Marson ZDNet UK
Published: 29 Mar 2006 11:05 BST
Software patent campaigner Florian Mueller revealed this week that the
City of Munich's decision to stall its Linux migration, was the result
of a PR stunt by anti-patent campaigners.
In the book, No Lobbyists As Such, published on Tuesday, Mueller tells
the story of how anti-patent campaigners successfully fought against the
software patent directive, which was eventually rejected by the European
Parliament in July 2005.
Anti-patent campaigners initially struggled to attract much press
attention around the software patent directive, so decided to take
drastic action, according to Mueller.
"If the media hadn't reported much on what had happened so far with
respect to software patents, then we had to make something happen that
they would report on. We had to provoke a real crisis. Right away," he
claims.
Mueller, along with a few others, came up with the idea of the Green
Party drafting written questions to the mayor of Munich, to ask about
software patents and their impact on the Munich's Linux migration
project, known as LiMux.
Mueller helped the Green Party draft the questions, which were then put
to the mayor of Munich at the end of July. A few days later, Mueller was
made aware of an email sent to the LiMux project mailing list by Wilhelm
Hoegner, the head of the data processing office at the City of Munich.
This email said that due to the questions tabled by the Green party the
project has been put on ice.
Mueller publicised this email, which resulted in a lot of press
attention, including coverage in mainstream publications, such as Der
Spiegel, a German weekly news magazine.
Various members of the free and open source community who were aware of
this stunt reportedly criticised Mueller, saying that he had endangered
a major implementation of Linux and had raised concerns among customers
that using open source software was risky.
But Mueller had no regrets about his actions. "I understood the concerns
that others had, but to me it was obvious that open source would suffer
more from the legalisation of software patents than from the LiMux
fallout. It seemed better to draw attention to the issue while it could
still be fixed than to remain silent and face the consequences later,"
he states in the book.
"The strongest point I could make in my defence was that none of the
other approaches had generated anything like a comparable level of press
coverage in 30 months of trying (counting from the first presentation of
the EU Commission's proposed directive until the LiMux stunt). The
political situation was grave. We couldn't afford to be too selective,"
he says.
Just over a week after Mueller's publicity stunt, the City of Munich
resumed its migration to Linux.
The Munich Linux migration remains one of the most high profile mass
implementations of the open source OS to date. A lot of speculation in
the open source community laid the blame for the delay at the feet of
Microsoft which was engaged in an aggressive PR activity to knock Linux,
exemplified by its Get the Facts campaign.
------
regards,
alexander.
|
|
