Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Same ol' same ol', I see

  • Subject: Re: Same ol' same ol', I see
  • From: rgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Roy Culley)
  • Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:34:08 +0200
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
  • References: <ZJSXg.13809$e66.5388@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com> <44c504-6jd.ln1@dog.did.it> <AxTXg.631$Tc5.605@newsfe08.lga>
  • Reply-to: roy.culley@xxxxxxxxx
  • Xref: news.mcc.ac.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:1167856
begin  risky.vbs
	<AxTXg.631$Tc5.605@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
	flatfish+++ <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:13:08 +0200, Roy Culley wrote:
> 
>> begin  risky.vbs
>> 	<ZJSXg.13809$e66.5388@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> 	wjbell <wjbell@xxxxxxxx> writes:
>>>
>>> Well well well,
>> 
>> wjbell the plagiarist returns. Whose code have you been stealing
>> recently wjbell and claiming as your own?
> 
> You're thinking of Roy Schestowitz, the person who uses copyrighted
> graphics without permission and then even after being informed keeps
> them on his website for weeks.

Please learn what plagiarize means.

-- 
Security is one of those funny things.  You can talk about being "more"
secure, but there's no such thing.  A vulnerability is a vulnerability, and
even one makes you just as insecure as anyone else.  Security is a binary
condition, either you are or you aren't. - Funkenbusch 1 Oct 2006

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index