Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Agri Replaces DB2, Chooses Open Source

  • Subject: Re: [News] Agri Replaces DB2, Chooses Open Source
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:52:56 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / ISBE, Manchester University / ITS / Netscape / MCC
  • References: <1160891263.444949.246170@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <1w9n2y1lbllsr$.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <avxYg.9852$hv5.4783@fe49.usenetserver.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ yttrx ] on Sunday 15 October 2006 22:12 \__

> Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 14 Oct 2006 22:47:43 -0700, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> 
>>> Agri Stats Selects Enterprise Open Source DB, Dumps IBM DB2
>>> 
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>| The renowned stability and reliability of EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL
>>>| foundation was a key factor in Agri Stats? decision to replace DB2
>>>| with EnterpriseDB. Since the switch, Agri Stats has enjoyed
>>>| trouble-free operation.
>>> `----
>>> 
>>> http://in.sys-con.com/read/284787_p.htm
>> 
>> Postgre is a good database.  Frankly, it makes no sense to pay huge
>> amounts of money for Oracle or DB2 when there are totally free
>> alternatives that
>> meet 100% of your needs.  Including Postgre, SQL Server Express, and (in
>> some case) MySQL.
> 
> Maybe you should just stick with being a windows lackey over there at
> St. Paul College, where nothing actually matters.

Dude, you're really protective when it comes to UNIXes, Solaris in
particular. I understand that you deal with DB2 in your daytime job, but why
disregard MySQL which has been proven to be highly competitive?

Best wishes,

Roy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index