Andrea <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 2006-09-13 22:31, * Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> __/ [ Richard Rasker ] on Wednesday 13 September 2006 20:32 \__
>>
>
> /cut/
>
>>
>> I guess we now know which toddler needs babysitting. The story sounds
>> familiar as it provides a classic example of people who have come to think
>> of computing in one narrow-minded way. Anything gets difficult? Then blame
>> somebody else. It's an ego game. And no explanation you can provide (no
>> matter how rational) will shut up that lad. It becomes a war of principles
>> and confidence. I suppose that you could have treated the caller in the same
>> way that you treat resident trolls. Knowing that you were all along correct,
>> you could have hung up (saves time, keeps blood pressure down on both ends).
>> Kids are more open to new things. Adults are stubborn grown-up children.
>
> Sorry to bother you, Roy, but did you *really* had to quote entire
> Richard's post to add a comment?
>
> Best regards,
Roy gets a stiffy when he sees his posting volume. There's only one
thing Roy's enjoys seeing more than his own name : and that's Windows
Crashing - and most of that, like his self deluded high opinion of his
own views & knowledge, has a place only in his dreams.
--
Your job is being a professor and researcher: That's one hell of a good excuse
for some of the brain-damages of minix.
-- Linus Torvalds to Andrew Tanenbaum
|
|
