In article <gOidnb3t1IXwxrjbnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Maverick <Sun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tim Smith wrote:
>
> > On 2007-04-16, Maverick <Sun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>No, they didn't dump the .NET software, but converted to an Open Source
> >>approach to a .NET-centric version.
> >>
> >>So it is all a matter of viewpoint isn't it.
> >>
> >>They dumped anything used by MS tools to make .NET software and used an
> >>open source methodology instead. By using this approach they eliminated
> >>the M$ tax. And that is really the jist of the whole thing.
> >
> >
> > Nope:
> >
> > "SplendidCRM was built on the Microsoft technology stack (Windows,
> > IIS, SQL Server, C#, and ASP.NET)."
> >
> > <http://www.splendidcrm.com/>
>
> According to the article it is built using open source tools.
>
> "SplendidCRM Software, Inc. has released SplendidCRM Professional 1.3
> and SplendidCRM Open-Source 1.3, Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
> applications licensed in part under the "SugarCRM Public License 1.1.3". "
> Looks like again you need to take remedial reading classes.
WTF are you talking about? That part you quoted doesn't say anything
about how it is built. It talks about its license.
As for how it is built, you can read about it yourself, on the
SplendidCRM website:
"SplendidCRM was built on the Microsoft technology stack (Windows,
IIS, SQL Server, C#, and ASP.NET)."
Is it your contention that the authors of SplendidCRM don't know how it
is built?
--
--Tim Smith
|
|
