Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: for Linux Advocates only

  • Subject: Re: for Linux Advocates only
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:11:49 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <Xns991CC2DA2BAD4JagChan@130.225.247.90> <87abwxzx6e.fsf@gmail.com> <f0l3cn$ev5$02$2@news.t-online.com> <pan.2007.04.24.17.24.27.736368@lazyeyez.net>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ alt ] on Tuesday 24 April 2007 18:23 \__

> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:14:47 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> 
>> Hadron Quark wrote:
>> 
>>> "J.C." <rup@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> 
>>>> http://linuxhelp.blogspot.com/2007/04/kernel-comparison-between-linux-
>>>> 2620.html
>>> 
>>> You mean for fudsters. What a dismal article.
>>> 
>> 
>> Luckily the "true linux advocate", "kernel hacker" and "emacs user" Hadron
>> Quark provided a long list (and reasonings) why that article is FUD.
> 
> There must be something wrong with my newsreader. I don't even see his
> articles.

The analysis is relatively objective, as opposed to [H]omer's recent Debian
GNU/Linux vs Vista comparison.

-- 
                ~~ With kind regards

Roy S. Schestowitz      | "Slashdot is standard-compliant... in Japan"
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap:  1036184k total,   350840k used,   685344k free,    50000k cached
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index