Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Microsoft 'Dumps' XBox360s to Survive Nintendo's Momentum

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Microsoft 'Dumps' XBox360s to Survive Nintendo's Momentum
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 06:14:15 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
MS cuts Xbox 360 prices Down Under

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft has today slashed the price of the Xbox 360 in Australia, bringing 
| the basic Core model down to the same price as Nintendo's globally popular 
| Wii console.  
`----

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/08/15/ms_oz_xbox_price_cuts/


Related:

Microsoft: XBox 360 Price Drop Won't Fix Broken Strategy

,----[ Quote ]
| So in the end, it doesn’t matter if the 360 is $50 or even $100 less. 
| Ultimately, the price cut will just reveal how niche the system has become. 
| 
| Exactly. Come on, guys. The blogosphere, be it the guys at GigaOM, Chris 
| Kohler at Wired Game I Life or myself, have come up with some pretty rational 
| approaches for how you can get it together. Unfortunately, however, our 
| protestations seem to fall on deaf ears. Best of luck with your "winning 
| strategy." I guess you know best.    
`----

http://biz.yahoo.com/seekingalpha/070809/43985_id.html?.v=1


Total world Wii sales close in on Xbox 360 tally

,----[ Quote ]
| Nintendo's Wii is nearing the Xbox 360's cumulative sales total, despite the 
| year-long availability advantage enjoyed by the Microsoft games consoles. New 
| figures put the Wii at 10.10m units sold to date worldwide, just behind the 
| 360's 10.32m.   
`----

http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2007/08/13/wii_nears_xbox_360/


Cringely the Unemployable on the fallacy of Web 2.0, Microsoft ruthlessness,
and the CB radio of our decade

,----[ Quote ]
| Davidson: Which software company would you hate to compete against? What 
| makes you single them out? 
| 
| Cringely: Microsoft of course. They have the deepest of pockets, unlimited 
| ambition, and they are willing to lose money for years and years just to make 
|                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| sure that you don't make any money, either. And they are mean, REALLY mean. 
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
| 
| Davidson: Why do you think Microsoft is mean? Are you implying some kind of 
| malicious intent rather than just ruthlessness? 
| 
| Cringely: Maybe "mean" is the wrong word to use for Microsoft. "Ruthless" is 
| good. The company is built in the image of Bill Gates and Bill is a guy who 
| gets caught-up in the game of business and doesn't typically see its personal 
| cost. To use what might seem to be an obscure example, just look at all the 
| various partnerships and industry consortia that Microsoft has announced 
| through the years that never produced a product or even a usable 
| specification. There have been literally dozens of these operations that are 
| intended solely to freeze the competition until Microsoft can figure what the 
| heck it actually wants to do. To Microsoft its a PR exercise that helps them 
| compete but to customers it is just a damned lie. That's ruthless. There are 
| plenty of other examples I can give but you get the point. I represent the 
| concerns of users, not vendors, and Microsoft doesn't really care about 
| users.            
`----

http://blog.businessofsoftware.org/2007/07/cringely-the-un.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index