Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: waterskidoo=flatfish nym

On Aug 28, 12:08 am, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> ____/ cc on Tuesday 28 August 2007 03:02 : \____
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Aug 27, 8:40 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >> ____/ William Poaster on Monday 27 August 2007 23:52 : \____
>
> >> > It was on, or about,  Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:20:44 +0100, that as I was
> >> > halfway through a large jam doughnut, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
> >> >> ____/ Kier on Monday 27 August 2007 11:00 : \____
>
> >> >>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:27:14 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
> >> >>>> ____/ Linonut on Monday 27 August 2007 03:09 : \____
>
> >> >>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o'
> >> >>>>> wisdom:
>
> >> >>>>>> waterskidoo was all along flatfish
>
> >> >>>>>> -Replying to self with crossposting
> >> >>>>>> -Knowledge or prior posts (going months back) -Familiarity with
> >> >>>>>> people who no longer post here -Writing style (paragraphs and
> >> >>>>>> newlines) -Child using XBox360
> >> >>>>>> -Female identity
> >> >>>>>> -Disappearing for several days after persistent posting, which
> >> >>>>>> incidentally is the same time when vile behaviour from flashfish
> >> >>>>>> nyms returns
>
> >> >>>>>> Flatfish had many people fooled, but it was several days ago that
> >> >>>>>> some of us realised that waterskidoo is probably flatfish.
>
> >> >>>>>> That last post confirms it. No more evidence could probably be
> >> >>>>>> needed. No need to even join more dots.
>
> >> >>>>> Roy, it is only suspicion, not confirmation.  You probably should
> >> >>>>> drop it.
>
> >> >>>>> Unless you like this flatfish guy coming at you with trash talk.
>
> >> >>>> No, I read many messages, so I know this for a /fact/. If I aligned
> >> >>>> some messages and brought them together, you would see this too.
>
> >> >>> No, you don't. At best it's a strong suposition.
>
> >> >>>> Gary should quit using the waterskidoo nym because he spilled the
> >> >>>> beans in many messages where it was flatfish ramblings coming from the
> >> >>>> mouth of 'waterskidoo'.
>
> >> >>> Wrong again.
>
> >> >>>> It's just surprising that some people still don't see this, so I
> >> >>>> assume that they haven't read enough messages and haven't seen all
> >> >>>> those "Aha" 'smoking guns'. I've killfiled all the nyms, including
> >> >>>> 'waterskidoo'. It saves bandwidth and reduces visual clutter.
>
> >> >>> I read everything she wrote. She stood up for you, Roy, are you going
> >> >>> to conveniently ignore that? Stop being narrow-minded.
>
> >> >> There's no "she". It was Gary all along.
>
> >> > Boy, can some people be suckered in.
>
> >> And *I* am the one going under scrutiny. About 4 days ago Mark warned that
> >> this puppet was putting wedges between the advocates. Even now that we know
> >> it's Gary, there's tension between advocates, because of 'her' (Gary's index
> >> finger puppet).
>
> > "Tension between advocates", or "a difference of opinion that occurs
> > commonly in Usenet"?
>
> Attacking one person while sucking up to another is a method for turning one
> person against another. It's a classic technique. Good cop, bad cop.
>


That only works on idiots and in the movies, so which is the case here?


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index