____/ William Poaster on Monday 27 August 2007 23:52 : \____
> It was on, or about, Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:20:44 +0100, that as I was
> halfway through a large jam doughnut, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> ____/ Kier on Monday 27 August 2007 11:00 : \____
>>
>>> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 04:27:14 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> ____/ Linonut on Monday 27 August 2007 03:09 : \____
>>>>
>>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o'
>>>>> wisdom:
>>>>>
>>>>>> waterskidoo was all along flatfish
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Replying to self with crossposting
>>>>>> -Knowledge or prior posts (going months back) -Familiarity with
>>>>>> people who no longer post here -Writing style (paragraphs and
>>>>>> newlines) -Child using XBox360
>>>>>> -Female identity
>>>>>> -Disappearing for several days after persistent posting, which
>>>>>> incidentally is the same time when vile behaviour from flashfish
>>>>>> nyms returns
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flatfish had many people fooled, but it was several days ago that
>>>>>> some of us realised that waterskidoo is probably flatfish.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That last post confirms it. No more evidence could probably be
>>>>>> needed. No need to even join more dots.
>>>>>
>>>>> Roy, it is only suspicion, not confirmation. You probably should
>>>>> drop it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unless you like this flatfish guy coming at you with trash talk.
>>>>
>>>> No, I read many messages, so I know this for a /fact/. If I aligned
>>>> some messages and brought them together, you would see this too.
>>>
>>> No, you don't. At best it's a strong suposition.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Gary should quit using the waterskidoo nym because he spilled the
>>>> beans in many messages where it was flatfish ramblings coming from the
>>>> mouth of 'waterskidoo'.
>>>
>>> Wrong again.
>>>
>>>
>>>> It's just surprising that some people still don't see this, so I
>>>> assume that they haven't read enough messages and haven't seen all
>>>> those "Aha" 'smoking guns'. I've killfiled all the nyms, including
>>>> 'waterskidoo'. It saves bandwidth and reduces visual clutter.
>>>
>>> I read everything she wrote. She stood up for you, Roy, are you going
>>> to conveniently ignore that? Stop being narrow-minded.
>>
>> There's no "she". It was Gary all along.
>
> Boy, can some people be suckered in.
And *I* am the one going under scrutiny. About 4 days ago Mark warned that this
puppet was putting wedges between the advocates. Even now that we know it's
Gary, there's tension between advocates, because of 'her' (Gary's index finger
puppet).
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | How I learned to stop worrying and love GNU/Linux
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU is Not UNIX | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine
|
|
