On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 00:04:16 +0100, Hadron
<hadronquark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>mark.kent.is.owned@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> flatfish wrote:
>>> On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:34:31 -0000, Tim Smith
>>> <reply_in_group@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On 2007-12-01, flatfish <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> Places where stats are kept, people can vote and it's easy to see what
>>> >> gets accepted and what gets plonked Roy Schestowitz can't hide his
>>> >> SPAM and off topic, paranoid messages.
>>> >
>>> >The most interesting stat is his performance on propellor.com (formerly
>>> >netscape.com), where he was *hired* because they were impressed by his
>>> >Digg volume:
>>> >
>>> > 20437 stories submitted
>>> > 100 stories voted to the homepage (0.49%)
>>> >
>>> >I wonder if they pay by the story, or just for the stories that get
>>> >voted up? If the former, that could explain why he doesn't seem to care
>>> >much about accuracy--several crappy stories will pay more than one good,
>>> >useful, story.
>>>
>>> Looking at those stats it seems fairly reasonable to assume that they
>>> pay by quantity not quality.
>>>
>>> FWIW Roy SPAMS
>>
>> Spamming is Roy's job.
>>
>>> the same exact stories to digg and COLA as well and
>>> it's obvious he has the process automated
>>
>> He's not begin paid too well by spamming one NG. He's got to spam
>> several places to earn a living, I suppose. Well, he's got to pay
>> bills and then pay Mark Kent his share for going through his network.
>> And lets not forget the creepy thing between Roy and Mark Kent's sons.
>> That might be involving money too.
>
>Don't forget the money rolling in from "modelling" for that Dutch guy's
>creepy collages of his OSS "heroes". I suspect Marti might well wet his
>panties if he sees those piccies of Roy all muscled up in front of the
>mirror. Creepy isn't the word.
Yea that's really sick.....
YUCK!
|
|
