Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Linux/OSS hypocrites: poor adherence to web markup standards

In comp.os.linux.advocacy, DFS
<nospam@xxxxxxxx>
 wrote
on Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:14:10 -0500
<dIm9j.16999$k27.382@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Today's markup validation results (compared to errors Feb 2007 and Sep 2006)
>
> http://validator.w3.org/
>
> www.linuxsecurity.com/ fails w/ 424 errors (356, 356)
> www.redhat.com fails w/ 3 errors  (15, 18)
> www.kernel.org passed validation  (passed, passed)
> www.ubuntu.com fails w/ 84 errors (20, 23)
> www.osdl.org fails w/ 10 errors  (passed, 38)
> www.distrowatch.com fails w/ 1566 errors  (940, 928)
>
> www.microsoft.com fails w/ 32 errors  (24, 2)
>
>
> New tests
> www.gnu.org  passed validation
> www.fsf.org fails w/ 11 errors
> www.slated.org/ ([H]omer The [H]ypocrite's site) failed w/ 29 errors
> www.schestowitz.com (lying spamming idiot's site) passed w/ 2 warnings
> www.websterscafe.com (Handover Phist's site) failed w/ 30 errors
> www.open4success.org (Rex Ballard's site) failed w/ 146 errors
> www.linetec.nl  (Richard Rasker's site)  failed w/ 22 errors
> www.glaci.com (Thad's site) failed w/ 3 errors
>
> There you have it - whines about MS breaking standards, but Linux bozos 
> aren't taking care of their own bizness...
>

He's absolutely right.  However, I'm curious as to
how well http://www.microsoft.com/ and its
helpers do in this area.

http://www.microsoft.com/ - 29 errors, 1 encoding warning.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/ - 119 errors, including
    errors in ampersand handling
http://www.live.com - 64 errors, including a really
    strange markup 'xmlns:web' which has no value
http://www.microsoft.com/silverlight/ - 28 errors, some
    of which appear to be because one specified HTML
    4.0 Transitional but used '/>' for empty tags.

Not that I'm much better; my vanity page has 12 errors
of its own, but I plead "I've not updated it lately".

It would be interesting to write an IE validator, which
would look for all constructs known to correctly work
in IE (but not necessarily in other browsers).

-- 
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Linux.  Because it's there and it works.
Windows.  It's there, but does it work?

-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index