__/ [ [H]omer ] on Friday 08 June 2007 07:05 \__
> Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>
>> http://www.wizy.org/wiki/ZFS_on_FUSE
>
> I can just about stomach NTFS on fuse, for the sake of portability with
> Sweaty's zombies, but using fuse in a production environment is just
> backwards.
>
>> Here's [H]omer's take on it (long):
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/6607bf3c83d915db/1f8fc253d0ed5d95?lnk=st
>
> And the followup:
>
>
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/browse_thread/thread/4fd44fca317f4b88/3650188494bf1684?lnk=st&q=&rnum=3#3650188494bf1684
>
I got into some friction with what I believe to be Sun employees in disguise.
They don't tolerate ZFS bashing, not after all that hype they have created.
That said, Morton recently gave a talk at Google and he stressed the need to
further improve Linux filesystems.
Leopard will have ZFS (Schwartz let the secret go). Good luck with that.
--
~~ Enjoying summertime
Roy S. Schestowitz | GPL'd 3-D Reversi: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer ¦ PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 22.8% user, 4.0% system, 0.6% nice, 72.6% idle
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|