____/ Rich on Thursday 21 June 2007 20:16 : \____
>
> "Phil Payne" <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1182452981.026682.243300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> The text associated with your link may come from several sources. Check
>>> your meta description tag to see if it contains the old description, then
>>> thenhttp://www.dmoz.orgfor your website. Take a look at the description
>>> if
>>> it's there. Google often uses this one.
>>
>> If it's from DMOZ, a robots metatag with content="noodp" would nail it.
>>
>
> Thanks Phil, I'd forgotten that one. Are there any other lesser known meta
> tags with special SE functions ?
It's been a long time since I last SEO'ed, but do DMOZ links still count a lot?
Are any of them actively maintained at all? A couple of years ago submission
to DMOZ seemed like a total waste of time.
Ta.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Code built upon another's is less prone to bugs
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 1510068k total, 75824k used, 1434244k free, 83516k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
|
|
