Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: nathanm on 32 bit OS/2, preannounced Windows, NeXT Screens and VisiOn ..

  • Subject: Re: nathanm on 32 bit OS/2, preannounced Windows, NeXT Screens and VisiOn ..
  • From: alt <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 02:32:15 GMT
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
  • References: <esc365$n7q$1@news.datemas.de> <3095474.5R2J9d0deQ@schestowitz.com> <QtydnftAHZ5MW3TYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@comcast.com>
  • User-agent: Pan/0.125 (Potzrebie)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:500379
On Sat, 03 Mar 2007 13:04:49 -0600, Linonut wrote:

> After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o'
> wisdom:
> 
>> __/ [ Doug Mentohl ] on Saturday 03 March 2007 15:00 \__
>>
>>> One parting comment is that this reminds me of the Windows vs VisiOn
>>> issue. This analogy isn't perfect, but the situation was we ("we" is
>>> to ne taken lightly - I sure wasn't here) preannounced Windows, signed
>>> up the major OEMs ans showed a demo to freeze the market and prevent
>>> VisiOn from getting any momentum. It sure worked - VisiOn died, VisiOn
>>> died and Dos kept on chugging.
>>> 
>>> http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/010807/PLEX_0052.pdf
>>
>> So was Vista preannounced as well? Was the 'terrible delay' just a part
>> of an act? 2003... then 2004... then 2005... some time in 2006... make
>> that XMas 2006... oh, well, it's January 2007... and it's still as
>> buggy as Hell (or Dell). If they hadn't 'frozen the market' as he calls
>> it, how many people would have switched back in 2001/2? Are customers
>> being fooled as part of these 'business decisions'?
> 
> Hey, Microsoft deserves some kudos for being able to keep vaporware
> afloat for over 4 years!
>

Lord knows they can't deliver real products in that time.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index