Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Linus Torvalds Responds To Microsoft Patent Claims

  • Subject: Re: Linus Torvalds Responds To Microsoft Patent Claims
  • From: Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 23:16:09 GMT
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: BellSouth Internet Group
  • References: <1179334392.578013.32090@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <gJadnT3XOaMFpNbbnZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d@speakeasy.net> <7983672.KVC6fNBImk@schestowitz.com>
  • Reply-to: linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:525497
After takin' a swig o' grog, Roy Schestowitz belched out this bit o' wisdom:

> __/ [ John Bailo ] on Wednesday 16 May 2007 18:04 \__
>
>> Ramon F Herrera wrote:
>>> The holder of the Linux trademark suggests Microsoft should name the
>>> patents it alleges have been violated so the claims can be tested in
>>> court.
>> 
>> Microsoft should be being pursued with due diligence by the FTC and SEC.
>> 
>> These kind of "vague announcements" soil the waters of the market.
>> 
>> If they can't back up their claims truthfully, then they've exposed
>> themselves to litigation.
>
> Someone has just told me about:
>
> http://www.microsoft-antitrust.gov/

Duh-amn!  Lookit that blindfold on Justice!

There's a complaint form at that site.  Might be worth a read of the
consent decree to see if it would be legitimate to complaint obout
Microsoft's potential RICO action.

-- 
   Tune in to the new season of "24".  Now with more torture!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index