Tim Smith wrote:
How is your using insulting names for people advocating Linux,
Roy?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/04a3d90e610f98df?dmode=source
or http://tinyurl.com/2z2g2y
[quote]
Subject: Mark Kent, go fuck yourself
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 09:14:46 GMT
From: Tim Smith <reply_in_gr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<aAedg.4954$921.2070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
--Tim Smith
[/quote]
How were your lies about Rod Trent's Digg submissions
advocating Linux, Roy?
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/871d2cfb7d29f1a0?dmode=source
or http://tinyurl.com/26vc2k
[quote]
Tim Smith wrote:
Or this one, for just his technology submissions:
<http://digg.com/users/rodtrent/news/submitted/view/technology>
You've said you believe Roy, even though you admit you haven't
checked. Why not spend a couple minutes and find out for
yourself?
Reference the official FAQ found at
at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
1.4 The Charter of comp.os.linux.advocacy
The charter of comp.os.linux.advocacy is:
For discussion of the benefits of Linux compared to other
operating systems.
That single sentence is the one and only charter of the
newsgroup comp.os.linux.advocacy. The newsgroup's charter is
for the newsgroup as a place for supporters of Linux to gather
to discuss Linux, for the betterment of the Linux community
and the promotion and development of Linux. It supports this
as a place for those who would like to learn more about Linux
to come to learn from those who know Linux. It does not call
for it to be a place where the anti-Linux propagandists to
gather in order to discredit Linux.
Recommend posting according to the charter. Concerns of a
poster's external activity beyond c.o.l.advocacy are not
"discussion of the benefits of Linux compared to other
operating operating systems", does not interest the Linux
advocates and is best left for other forums.
[/quote]
[rest of ad nauseum rants deleted]
--
HPT
|
