Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] The Reasons a Linux/FLOSS Installation is Less Prone to 'Breakage'

  • Subject: Re: [News] The Reasons a Linux/FLOSS Installation is Less Prone to 'Breakage'
  • From: flatfish <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:15:24 -0500
  • Bytes: 1477
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:RFCbSqsHwJrWcFy+2adZnw75NK4=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
  • References: <2949618.eiEqkeRur4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:580856
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 06:39:44 +0000, Roy Schestowitz
<newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>The Single Point of Failure
>
>,----[ Quote ]
>| So, when it comes to a single point of failure what comes to mind are these 

The number one reason is because the Linux installation usually gets
wiped quickly and Windows gets re-installed.

IOW Linux doesn't even have enough time on the system to break.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index