Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] [Rival] Windows Vista = XP with Less Applications, Less Speed, More Bugs

AZ Nomad wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:13:22 +0000, William Poaster <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
>>AZ Nomad wrote:
> 
>>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:21:48 -0600, Erik Funkenbusch
>>> <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:59:41 +0000, William Poaster wrote:
>>> 
>>>>>> Better yet, run a file system that doesn't need defragmentation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Absolutely.
>>>>> Oops! Careful now! We'll have the Quack troll saying, that we said linux
>>>>> filesystems don't fragment.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not joking, that's *just* what he said in another group. I replied to
>>>>> someone that modern linux filesystems don't need defragmenting. The idiot
>>>>> Quack troll claimed that I said linux filesystems don't fragment! See how
>>>>> dumb he is?
>>> 
>>>>There are 2... well, maybe 3 possible reasons the statement "linux
>>>>filesystems don't need defragmenting" could be true.
>>> 
>>>>1) Linx filesystems don't fragment (we know that's not true, and you are
>>>>admitting to as much here)
>>> nobody is saying that.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>2) Linux filesystems do not suffer any performance degradation from
>>>>fragmentation (that's a silly argument)
>>> nobody is saying that either
> 
>>Nope, but OTOH they do not suffer any *noticeable* effects.
> 
>>>>3) Linux filesystems automatically defrag themselves (which is, in effect
>>>>saying #1, thus also not true).
>>> three strikes.  You're out.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Which word in "doesn't need defragmentation" don't you understand?
> 
>>The idiot's misinterpreted what you said, just the same way as Quack did with
>>me. WTF is it with these windoze tards, don't they understand what they read?
> 
> It's not that.  It's a diversionary tactic away from the previous discussion
> of vista being dog slow.  

Ah, another troll tactic of diversion.  

> This whole fragmentation discussion spawned from 
> a windows appologist theorizing that vista piss poor performance was due
> to it doing a defrag in the background.

-- 
Operating systems: FreeBSD 6.2 (64bit), PC-BSD 1.4,
Testing: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA 2
Linux systems: Kubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy" amd64,
Debian 4.0, PCLinuxOS 2007.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index