SELinux — is it *really* too complex?
,----[ Quote ]
| What I discovered is that part of SELinux’s current dilemma is more easily
| fixable than the other, because it has nothing to do with technological chops
| and everything to do with public perception. Jim Klein, the director of
| information services and technology at the California-based Saugus Union
| School District, put it best: “The biggest problem for SELinux is mindshare,”
| Klein told me. “It developed a stigma early on due to the lack of tools for
| configuration and troubleshooting, which led people to simply turn it off.”
| Currently, Klein is one of the many IT guys who has the SELinux switch in
| the “off” position.
`----
http://enterpriselinuxlog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/09/26/selinux-is-it-really-too-complex/
Another easy transition...
Migrating to SugarCRM on Linux
,----[ Quote ]
| The first consideration is the platform from which you're migrating and, in
| particular, the impact of that move on Linux.
`----
http://searchenterpriselinux.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid39_gci1273416,00.html
Recent:
SELinux vs. OpenBSD's Default Security
,----[ Quote ]
| Darrin Chandler suggested, "security should not be grafted on, it should be
| integrated into the main development process. I'm sure the patch maintainers
| are doing their best, but this doesn't change the fundamental flaw in the
| process. It's not a flaw of their making, it's inherent in the situation. But
| it's still a flaw."
`----
http://kerneltrap.org/OpenBSD/SELinux_vs_OpenBSDs_Default_Security
|
|
